URBAN VIOLENCE OR URBAN PEACE?

Barry Weisberg, J.D.

 

This is a summary of a paper, “Breaking the Urban Cycle of Violence, Building An Urban Culture of Peace,” delivered at the United Nations-South African sponsored conference, Urban Safety, Safety  For All, Johannesburg, South Africa, October 26-30, 1998.  Revised from an earlier presentation to the Culture of Peace Program, UNESCO, Paris . 

 

WORDS: 701


Violence in cities has existed for thousands of years.   But today, cities have become the epicenter of  violence.   A United Nations meeting of Mayors stated their dismay at “the rising levels of crime, violence, racism, drug abuse and  social disintegration...”

In Moscow and Shanghai , where the “fee market” has unraveled both social order and  social services, every kind of violence is skyrocketing.  In Tokyo, 80% of female train commuters have experienced some form of sexual abuse.  Terrorist bombings in New York and Karachi, ethnic classes in Mumbay, the rise of suicide and street violence in Mexico City or the murder of street children in Sao Paulo or Rio de Janeiro, are examples of the growing urban urban violence. 

Both the unprecedented rate of  urbanization and the rapid  concentration of urban dwellers in a  few large mega-cities are products of  globalization. The concentration of wealth mandates the concentration of people.  People are both pushed to  and pulled into cities. Two dozen cities of two million people are born annually.  But the promise of urbanization is rapidly usurped by the problems of urban survival.  The lack of urban democracy and the synergistic interplay between poverty and violence deprive increasing numbers of urban dwellers of basic human needs and  fundamental human rights.   As many as one half  the residents of large cities live in poverty, without adequate housing, sanitation or living wage jobs, let alone education or health care. 


            In response Mayors are adopting various schemes for “urban safety,” importing “best practice”  or attempting to improve “urban management.”  But geometric population growth will undermine attempts at  social order or urban services.  Environmental ruin,   resource scarcity, and the reduction of biodiversity will generate increasing conflict.  The narrow attempt to focus on epidemic violent  crime without addressing endemic urban violence,  will not work.    Furthermore, the rhetoric of “urban safety” is a relic of Cold War thinking that fails to distinguish between the illusion of “safety” and the need for   economic, social, political, cultural and environmental human security.  In cities that are divided by class, race and ethnic origin, “urban safety” is always safety for the few at the expense of the many.  And finally, humanity has significantly altered over 50% of the earth, dominates 73% of the earth and utilizes over 40,000 species everyday.  The urban violence against the land, air, water and other species will have a  boomerang affect on cities.   For example, global warming could undermine food supplies and  raise sea levels, where most large cities are located.  These “man made” disasters are likely to  overwhelm cities.


The alternative must be to replace the urban cycle of violence with an urban culture of peace. Urban peace is not the  lowering of crime rates, the promotion of non-violence or greater tolerance - though such steps help.  Urban peace would resolve inter-personal and institutional conflict equitably and  peacefully. It is rooted in cooperation, mutual aid, justice, and ultimately, love.  Urban peace would recognize and value our dependency upon the geosphere, biosphere and humansphere.   Building an urban culture of peace requires cities to implement strategic plans that insure at least three essentials.     First, the cycle of violence must be broken,  establishing progressive  20% reduction goals for violence, pollution and waste, matched by similar  equity goals,  every three to five years.  Citizens must create family-community-school peace corps.  Second, cities must become increasingly self reliant and autonomous human settlements,  less dependent on the global “free market.”   Food, energy, water and materials must be primarily secured locally. Cities must identify levels of complexity, scale, density, diversity and speed that enhance human well being.  Third, an urban infrastructure of human  security must insure human needs and human rights for all residents.  Until and unless the escalating  economic and social disparities of cities are reversed and  equity established, there will be no urban peace.

Building a culture of peace will be more complex and more difficult than the cycle of violence.  Genuine solutions must be advanced on a scale adequate to the challenge.   Creating an urban culture of peace will require bold, ground breaking leadership by Mayors.  What is certain is that the outlooks and institutions that brought us the urban cycle of violence will not lead us to urban cultures of peace.

-30-

 

 

 

Barry Weisberg, J.D.,  is an international consultant on global violence.  In 1999 he will publish Violence: Past, Present, Future. 

 

 

From October 24-October 31, 1998, Mr. Weisberg can be reached at the Parktonian Hotel, Johannesburg, South Africa. Copyright available upon request.  Telephone: 011-403-5740.